CM Punk won a match to earn the right to face The Undertaker at Wrestlemania. If CM Punk cannot be involved in the title match between The Rock and John Cena, which I would rather he would be, facing Taker is not a huge step down at all, win or lose. As for The Undertaker, CM Punk is obviously a worthy opponent. The issue was only whether or not he would be good to go in a big singles match. If not, having him be part of a tag match against The Shield would not have been a bad idea. As they said in their promo on Raw last night, they have a ton of momentum. Their undefeated streak is obviously not as impressive and hyped as The Undertaker's, but it could have been the start of a good feud. Nevertheless, singles matches are worth more. They are more personal. CM Punk and Taker should be able to put up a good feud.
Going back to what I said yesterday about Big Show and Mark Henry possibly needing to consider retiring, why didn't I say the same for Kane? That is a guy who has been there since I started watching in 1998, just like the other two. I just feel Kane's character has more versatility and is more intriguing. He can be heel one minute, then face the next. He can dominate, then turn around and job. And his credibility is never really ruined too much. It might get annoying to see him become a comedy character now and then, but that is part of his versatility. I just feel there are more options for him than Big Show or Mark Henry.
No comments:
Post a Comment