How Long Can Kane Last On Top?

This is the best Kane has ever looked against The Undertaker in his entire career. That is saying a lot. A lot of men come and go in the WWE without even getting to look half as good against Taker in a 1-month feud. Kane is not only the one who put Taker in that "vegetative state", he has looked better than Taker at every PPV since Taker returned at Summerslam. Recently, Paul Bearer did indeed turn heel and side with Kane. Undertaker is once again on the ropes.

I am surprised that they have developed so much in making Kane look strong. I was happy the first time he retained the title against Undertaker, but was not expecting to win at Hell in a Cell too. Do they feed him to Taker now? It would be nice if they invested one more title feud for Kane against someone else first. But who? And why? Just to make his title reign seem a little bit more full, as if he really could be considered the centerpiece for this time. He has been definitely getting the promo time and focus.

Why should Taker still eventually go over Kane? Why not? Taker is the face. This is obviously what the WWE is leading up to. Unless the face gets injured, decides to retire, or some combination of that and anything else, this is the kind of story in which it is only logical that the face eventually wins against the well-developed heel. Taker bringing in Paul Bearer could have been a way to get his "power" back. That backfired. That creativity is in the WWE's hands. How can Taker get it back together to get his revenge against Kane, and also Paul Bearer to some degree? That is a question that can draw for Smackdown. It would be funny if that does a better job at getting a 2.0 for the show than Cena hype. I doubt it will. Still, got to give WWE credit for the attempt.