Over The Limit's pre-show match will be Zack Ryder vs. Kane. After Kane finished putting over John Cena, the proper option would have been to have him feud with Zack Ryder, who was a pawn in the larger feud between Kane and Cena. Instead, the WWE went with Kane vs. Orton. That feud is now over. Zack Ryder could have still been an option for Kane to feud with, right? Did they end up feuding? No. Having a match does not mean the same thing as a feud.
What have either of these two guys been doing recently? Nothing. Would it have been that difficult to develop something? This is another perfect example of the WWE passing up good opportunities to do something interesting with the midcard. So what if this feud would not have been a means to propel either guy to a bigger push? If done right, it could have been something interesting to get the fans tuned in and interested in both of these guys for a while.
Who wins? Not that it matters too much, since the WWE is not pushing either guy well right now, but Kane should win. How far would he have fallen if he does lose to Ryder? He went from being a monster terrorizing Cena and his friends, to feuding with Randy Orton and beating him at Wrestlemania, and ends up losing to Zack Ryder? Had this been a real feud, they might have built up to it being something Ryder could win. As it stands now, at least give Kane a little something to keep him looking like a monster. He did beat Big Show this week, but it was a cheap win, as would be expected. From beating Big Show to jobbing to Ryder in one week, could you picture it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment