It is a shame when you look at how TNA is using Mickie James. She has not won a singles match on Impact since January. Her few victories on the show since then have all been tag matches. TNA loves to cycle people in and out, and everyone becomes a victim of that. No one ever really gets anywhere. Even if they do get those KO tag titles back to some level of prestige and give them to Mickie and a partner, I don't have confidence in them handling this well. They are beyond that point of giving them the benefit of the doubt, which is something I usually like doing.
Mickie James is not going to make it. Not only is TNA not going to treat her in the manner that she has earned and to really get good value out of her to help themselves, but why would the WWE want her back? I can picture a one-night appearance down the road, but I think the majority of Mickie fans who want her to return to the WWE want her back for another run, not for one night. The WWE diva division has collapsed. The WWE continued pushing the same goal for their diva division that they were for years before Mickie James debuted. With Kelly Kelly not being reliable, since she is obviously not committed enough to be a true centerpiece, they were left with no one they were willing to build as centerpiece. That caused the collapse. Had they legitimately gone with Mickie James in 2008 or 2009, no collapse would have happened. They would have had a centerpiece who was dedicated to the company, not as prone to injury as other divas, solid in the ring, and most importantly of all, this was the woman who was the most over diva on the roster. Instead, they used her as filler when Candice Michelle was injured in 2008 and as a credible jobber for Maryse and Michelle McCool in 2009.
Even though the WWE diva division has collapsed, they are refusing to give it up. They are sending mixed signals. I am aware of that report about Triple H not liking diva wrestling and wanting to get rid of it. On the one hand, they did hire another female wrestler around the time of that report. On the other hand, they also released a female wrestler who was in developmental. Moreover, it isn't a female wrestler facing Layla for the title. Either Tamina or Natalya could have been developed for that feud. Fact is, the WWE could have 11 out of 12 of the women on their roster be true female wrestlers, but as long as that woman left over is an eye-candy diva being pushed as the centerpiece, the diva division still stands. The WWE is having success with AJ. When Sara Del Rey comes on board, they can easily push her to appease the angry fans of women's wrestling. Even though the division has collapsed, they can still wait it out and rebuild to what they want it to be very easily.
And it is nearly impossible to have a good conversation about Mickie's WWE career with most people. Well, it is for me. If you talk about the treatment Mickie got over her run, people will bring up what her ex said. She slept her way to the top in 2008, then screwed herself. I have spoken about her push in 2008 many times. On my old diva blog, I even wrote just about that reign once. It was a blatant filler push. The WWE lost their centerpiece to injury and had to fall back on Mickie James as interim centerpiece. Mickie was the most convenient and qualified option to push. Convenient? She was the woman pushed against Beth Phoenix when Candice got injured the first time. That push got cut the very night Candice returned. Qualified? The only other two face divas on Raw at the time were Maria and Ashley. Mickie James was more qualified to carry the division for 4 months than those two. Honestly, going any other way would have been more strange than giving Mickie James the push. And Kenny makes it seem like Mickie's career was just jobbing on Smackdown. She won a lot of matches, got an elaborate storyline, and did win the title. Problem is, it was all for the same reason as her debut storyline. She was being used to put over a centerpiece. If you actually read some of the things Kenny said, it looks like he is copying dirtsheet reports and what the Internet was saying. This isn't even a matter of whether the chicken came before the egg. He said what he did after dirtsheets already made it available to the world. His analysis of Mickie's career is not new or precise.
What will it take for Mickie James to be given another great opportunity? Being completely honest, I can't think of anything. TNA does not know how to develop stars and properly treat the ones they have to develop them more. The WWE is fine with allowing their diva division to fall to pieces, so they can get by with anything. Hopefully, Mickie James will one day get back some of what was taken away from her.
Friday, August 31, 2012
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
A Midcard Rise Over 3 Hours
Now that a few weeks have passed since Raw officially went to 3 hours, how have they been doing? I think they are getting into a good groove now. Without even mentioning the tag division or women's division, which are things I frequently talk about, just look at singles feuds and storylines in the midcard. Damien Sandow and Brodus Clay have a feud going. Cody Rhodes, who was lost in the shuffle for a while, is once again relevant, feuding with Sin Cara. Zack Ryder looks to finally be getting some kind of storyline where he is not being used to put over John Cena's character. An extra hour gives the WWE more time to feature other talent, and I think they are doing a good job with that.
Of course, there are a few casualties. Where's Christian? Besides him, you might remember that Tensai and Tyson Kidd had a mini-feud going. Why didn't I say anything about that weeks ago? I didn't have much faith the WWE would go anywhere with that. Kidd is a lower-midcarder and Tensai has fallen. I would have been more surprised if the WWE followed through with a singles push for Kidd. Having the feud phase out, that isn't a shocker. Kidd can still be relevant in the tag division revival. You can also bring up other guys in the same rank as Kidd who are not being pushed well, like JTG and Riley, but things seem to okay in general. You can't push everyone. If the WWE rotates the lower-midcarders getting focus, and I mean more than just being squashed, things could still work well.
Beyond all that, the only thing I find annoying about the new Raw format is all the social media. Yeah, I'm not a big fan of that social media stuff. If I was, I would probably have a lot more readers by now. Nevertheless, I don't mind having the fans vote for match types or who gets to face who. I like that. I don't like having celebrities giving their opinions during the shows. I know that it sells the idea of how popular the WWE is, but I find it annoying. I also don't like Tout. These days, wrestlers give mini-promos via the Internet. It was useful when Sheamus stole Del Rio's car, since it would be crazy to have a cameraman riding with Sheamus. But besides that, it is really a waste. Most of the stuff these wrestlers say in those few seconds can be typed up on Twitter, which they still do, anyway.
How about the ratings? How have Raw's ratings been since the 1000th episode, which brought in what will most likely be the highest ratings of the year? Keep in mind that the first hour of 3-hour Raws typically drag the overall number down. That being said, Raw is actually still getting the same range of ratings as it did last year, back when Raw was still 2 hours long. How will they contend against football? Raw's yearly average last year was about a 3.2. This year, it is already a 3.16. There is no way they will be able to legitimately get the ratings up to avoid doing even worse than last year.
And Smackdown's ratings? The thing to look for there is how ratings have done since around May. Last year, shortly after Randy Orton won the World's Heavyweight Championship, Smackdown's numbers dropped. Was it because of him? Ratings killer? Or was it something that happens around this time of year? In other words, just a coincidence? Just glancing over the numbers, ratings this year for the last few months do seem better than they were a year ago. Slightly better. I still wouldn't jump to the conclusion that Orton killed the ratings on Smackdown last year. This year's summer ratings were still lower than earlier this year's ratings, which would lend credibility to the idea that ratings are cyclical. That is to say, it was probably baseball or whatever else is on TV during the summer that people love to watch.
As for TNA, they had a very high viewership last week. Ratings were not the highest of the year, but I like paying attention to viewership more than ratings, but there isn't exactly one chart for yearly viewership, like there is for ratings. The combination of their summer storyline and Hulk Hogan got the viewers to tune in. But how will they follow through? The yearly average is still far below what it was last year, when it was at its peak. Right now, it is at a 1.03. If you just stop and think about it, if they get some horrible numbers in the months left in this year, their yearly average might just drop below a 1.0. That would be very pathetic, but possible.
Of course, there are a few casualties. Where's Christian? Besides him, you might remember that Tensai and Tyson Kidd had a mini-feud going. Why didn't I say anything about that weeks ago? I didn't have much faith the WWE would go anywhere with that. Kidd is a lower-midcarder and Tensai has fallen. I would have been more surprised if the WWE followed through with a singles push for Kidd. Having the feud phase out, that isn't a shocker. Kidd can still be relevant in the tag division revival. You can also bring up other guys in the same rank as Kidd who are not being pushed well, like JTG and Riley, but things seem to okay in general. You can't push everyone. If the WWE rotates the lower-midcarders getting focus, and I mean more than just being squashed, things could still work well.
Beyond all that, the only thing I find annoying about the new Raw format is all the social media. Yeah, I'm not a big fan of that social media stuff. If I was, I would probably have a lot more readers by now. Nevertheless, I don't mind having the fans vote for match types or who gets to face who. I like that. I don't like having celebrities giving their opinions during the shows. I know that it sells the idea of how popular the WWE is, but I find it annoying. I also don't like Tout. These days, wrestlers give mini-promos via the Internet. It was useful when Sheamus stole Del Rio's car, since it would be crazy to have a cameraman riding with Sheamus. But besides that, it is really a waste. Most of the stuff these wrestlers say in those few seconds can be typed up on Twitter, which they still do, anyway.
How about the ratings? How have Raw's ratings been since the 1000th episode, which brought in what will most likely be the highest ratings of the year? Keep in mind that the first hour of 3-hour Raws typically drag the overall number down. That being said, Raw is actually still getting the same range of ratings as it did last year, back when Raw was still 2 hours long. How will they contend against football? Raw's yearly average last year was about a 3.2. This year, it is already a 3.16. There is no way they will be able to legitimately get the ratings up to avoid doing even worse than last year.
And Smackdown's ratings? The thing to look for there is how ratings have done since around May. Last year, shortly after Randy Orton won the World's Heavyweight Championship, Smackdown's numbers dropped. Was it because of him? Ratings killer? Or was it something that happens around this time of year? In other words, just a coincidence? Just glancing over the numbers, ratings this year for the last few months do seem better than they were a year ago. Slightly better. I still wouldn't jump to the conclusion that Orton killed the ratings on Smackdown last year. This year's summer ratings were still lower than earlier this year's ratings, which would lend credibility to the idea that ratings are cyclical. That is to say, it was probably baseball or whatever else is on TV during the summer that people love to watch.
As for TNA, they had a very high viewership last week. Ratings were not the highest of the year, but I like paying attention to viewership more than ratings, but there isn't exactly one chart for yearly viewership, like there is for ratings. The combination of their summer storyline and Hulk Hogan got the viewers to tune in. But how will they follow through? The yearly average is still far below what it was last year, when it was at its peak. Right now, it is at a 1.03. If you just stop and think about it, if they get some horrible numbers in the months left in this year, their yearly average might just drop below a 1.0. That would be very pathetic, but possible.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
CM Punk's Slow Heel Turn
I like how they are having CM Punk's heel turn be drawn out. In terms of the storyline, he is pretty much denying that he is a bad guy (heel). Yes, technically, he is a tweener. How much more is it going to take to finally consider him a heel? Daniel Bryan also had a drawn out heel turn at the end of last year. Turns like that usually make for interesting storylines.
Is this current storyline actually good? I like that they are drawing it out, because there is creative focus in what is going on, but I don't really like this character CM Punk has. He wants respect. He is sick of being in Cena's shadow. He wants to be acknowledged as the best. The only real difference between this CM Punk and the CM Punk from last year's epic storyline is a lack of edge. Last year, CM Punk was edgy and said things fans loved hearing. That led to him turning face. This year, CM Punk is whiny. He is definitely going to get some fans to turn on him like this, especially when he is targeting Jerry Lawler. But the character itself is lame. It's not that intriguing.
And what about Cena? He is his usual self. He is the hero. Not much new character development for him. This whole CM Punk turn is providing Cena with more opportunities to sell that usual character. He refuses to say that someone else is better than him. He has to believe he is the best to be able to do his job. He puts his morals ahead of title opportunities. Of course, he is still getting a title shot. I can see him winning the title at Night of Champions and losing it back to Punk at Hell in a Cell. Have to see how they develop things further in the coming weeks.
Is this current storyline actually good? I like that they are drawing it out, because there is creative focus in what is going on, but I don't really like this character CM Punk has. He wants respect. He is sick of being in Cena's shadow. He wants to be acknowledged as the best. The only real difference between this CM Punk and the CM Punk from last year's epic storyline is a lack of edge. Last year, CM Punk was edgy and said things fans loved hearing. That led to him turning face. This year, CM Punk is whiny. He is definitely going to get some fans to turn on him like this, especially when he is targeting Jerry Lawler. But the character itself is lame. It's not that intriguing.
And what about Cena? He is his usual self. He is the hero. Not much new character development for him. This whole CM Punk turn is providing Cena with more opportunities to sell that usual character. He refuses to say that someone else is better than him. He has to believe he is the best to be able to do his job. He puts his morals ahead of title opportunities. Of course, he is still getting a title shot. I can see him winning the title at Night of Champions and losing it back to Punk at Hell in a Cell. Have to see how they develop things further in the coming weeks.
Monday, August 27, 2012
Alberto Del Rio Vs. Sheamus: Take...I Lost Count
Yes, even I am getting tired of it now. Once again, Alberto Del Rio is getting a title shot against Sheamus. This feud has lasted even longer than the feud between Randy Orton and Christian last year. If you think about it, the seeds of this feud were planted right after Sheamus won the World's Heavyweight Championship at Wrestlemania. It was then placed on the back burner, while Sheamus finished up with Daniel Bryan. And now, the WWE won't end it.
Once again, however, the WWE has done something great for Del Rio. They allowed him to beat Randy Orton clean, and by submission. Yes, Randy Orton tapped out. It wasn't a complete burial. Orton still got a hit on Dolph Ziggler, who was going to cash in on Sheamus. As for Del Rio, they keep on building him well, but they just need to pull the trigger already. The guy already has two WWE Championship reigns to his name. He's credible. I know a lot of fans will say that he is not over with the crowd yet. Do more with the storylines. There is no reason to just keep making him look so credible over all this time, without even giving him the title. They were not afraid to let Orton look weak for this guy's benefit, so Sheamus can take a hit. Sheamus did take a hit last week. With a shoe.
Randy Orton is now on the radar of the title feud. I think they really just need to get the title on Del Rio, then eventually transition to a feud with Orton. Once Orton does eventually regain the title, that can lead to a feud with Wade Barrett or Ziggler using the briefcase on Orton. Ziggler hasn't even held the briefcase for a full 2 months yet. There is still plenty of time to have him wait and develop him further. But will Randy Orton retake his spot as top man on Smackdown?
Once again, however, the WWE has done something great for Del Rio. They allowed him to beat Randy Orton clean, and by submission. Yes, Randy Orton tapped out. It wasn't a complete burial. Orton still got a hit on Dolph Ziggler, who was going to cash in on Sheamus. As for Del Rio, they keep on building him well, but they just need to pull the trigger already. The guy already has two WWE Championship reigns to his name. He's credible. I know a lot of fans will say that he is not over with the crowd yet. Do more with the storylines. There is no reason to just keep making him look so credible over all this time, without even giving him the title. They were not afraid to let Orton look weak for this guy's benefit, so Sheamus can take a hit. Sheamus did take a hit last week. With a shoe.
Randy Orton is now on the radar of the title feud. I think they really just need to get the title on Del Rio, then eventually transition to a feud with Orton. Once Orton does eventually regain the title, that can lead to a feud with Wade Barrett or Ziggler using the briefcase on Orton. Ziggler hasn't even held the briefcase for a full 2 months yet. There is still plenty of time to have him wait and develop him further. But will Randy Orton retake his spot as top man on Smackdown?
Labels:
Alberto Del Rio,
Dolph Ziggler,
Randy Orton,
Sheamus,
Smackdown,
WWE
Friday, August 24, 2012
Brief Thoughts On Gail Kim And Aces & Eights
Gail Kim turned on the WWE last year and returned to TNA. She soon won both the KO title and tag titles. They built her up to look strong. And now? She is rotated out for the benefit of Brooke Tessmacher. I like both of these women. My problem is that TNA continues to run this foolish system of rotating out their centerpieces. And people are surprised that they never get anywhere? This is not how you build stars or use stars effectively to draw. One more thing I want to say about Gail. Has this run worked out as well as her first run? No. Gail Kim got people talking when she first joined TNA. She came in at a time before the KO division was officially made. She benefited from being developed in the periphery. When the division was formed, she was the first Champion. Not too long after all that, the WWE wanted her back. Had she stayed, would TNA have cycled her out back then? Can't be completely sure now, but if they were going to, she ended up never having to go through that. Now, she does.
I go from criticizing TNA to giving them credit for something. The Aces & Eights storyline is still going on. I compared it to the Nexus storyline the WWE had. TNA is doing two things differently that I like. First, they have kept the identities a secret. They will all turn out to be people who are not too important (not to be rude), but keeping it a surprise does make it more interesting. Everyone knew who the guys on Nexus were. They were rookies from NXT. Having rookies rise up like that was great, but there is still something to be said for keeping it a mystery to the general audience, like TNA is doing. Second thing I like, they are actually treating this as some kind of witch hunt. Who is behind these guys? When the WWE ran the Nexus stable, people were wondering who was having them do this. It turned out that they were on their own. That's fine. It could turn out that Aces & Eights are not led by an active performer on the roster. They are just making trouble by beating down people and playing mind games. So far, this is a better summer angle than Brock Lesnar and Triple H feuding.
I go from criticizing TNA to giving them credit for something. The Aces & Eights storyline is still going on. I compared it to the Nexus storyline the WWE had. TNA is doing two things differently that I like. First, they have kept the identities a secret. They will all turn out to be people who are not too important (not to be rude), but keeping it a surprise does make it more interesting. Everyone knew who the guys on Nexus were. They were rookies from NXT. Having rookies rise up like that was great, but there is still something to be said for keeping it a mystery to the general audience, like TNA is doing. Second thing I like, they are actually treating this as some kind of witch hunt. Who is behind these guys? When the WWE ran the Nexus stable, people were wondering who was having them do this. It turned out that they were on their own. That's fine. It could turn out that Aces & Eights are not led by an active performer on the roster. They are just making trouble by beating down people and playing mind games. So far, this is a better summer angle than Brock Lesnar and Triple H feuding.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Ryback and Mahal
How can anyone pass by an opportunity to talk about Jinder Mahal? Honestly, I want to talk about this feud between Ryback and Jinder Mahal just to note that it is a feud where one person is obviously being developed to put over another. Not only is this not a feud between equals, but one guy is definitely getting shot back down when it is over. I haven't had a good example of that to talk about in a while. Jericho was being used to help put over Ziggler, but Jericho is a star and Ziggler is a rising star. Triple H put over Lesnar, but I have already pointed out that both these guys are big.
What about Ryback and Jinder Mahal? Ryback has been on a huge role since he came in a few months ago. He was squashing multiple individuals at a time. This feud with Mahal is his first real feud. It's not the kind of feud that leads to a big PPV showdown, but it is good for the midcard on the regular shows. Jinder Mahal, on the other hand, hasn't really been too relevant in a while. When the WWE first showed focus in prolonging the issues between these two, you could tell who was most likely being developed to put over who. The feud will most likely end on Smackdown this week. After that, Ryback continues to work up the ladder. Mahal gets shot back down the ladder.
I still don't care about Ryback that much. However, he is connecting well with the fans, so who really cares what I think? And if the WWE is willing to make the midcard more interesting through developing feuds with him, even better. Both midcard titles are currently on two heels. That means that this is the perfect environment to put them on midcard faces to develop those faces more. Main-event faces, like Rey Mysterio and Christian, don't need to win the U.S. or Intercontinental titles right now. I don't know how many more heels they want to feed to Ryback to get him built further, but a title reign would be nice.
What about Ryback and Jinder Mahal? Ryback has been on a huge role since he came in a few months ago. He was squashing multiple individuals at a time. This feud with Mahal is his first real feud. It's not the kind of feud that leads to a big PPV showdown, but it is good for the midcard on the regular shows. Jinder Mahal, on the other hand, hasn't really been too relevant in a while. When the WWE first showed focus in prolonging the issues between these two, you could tell who was most likely being developed to put over who. The feud will most likely end on Smackdown this week. After that, Ryback continues to work up the ladder. Mahal gets shot back down the ladder.
I still don't care about Ryback that much. However, he is connecting well with the fans, so who really cares what I think? And if the WWE is willing to make the midcard more interesting through developing feuds with him, even better. Both midcard titles are currently on two heels. That means that this is the perfect environment to put them on midcard faces to develop those faces more. Main-event faces, like Rey Mysterio and Christian, don't need to win the U.S. or Intercontinental titles right now. I don't know how many more heels they want to feed to Ryback to get him built further, but a title reign would be nice.
Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Chris Jericho Leaves, Again
The WWE wrote off Chris Jericho with a "Contract vs. Contract" match against Dolph Ziggler on Raw. Going back a step, Jericho did beat Ziggler at Summerslam. Does that count as winning the "big one"? On one hand, that was Jericho's first and only PPV win since his return. You can say that makes it a big win. On the other hand, nothing was on the line. Chris Jericho failed to win the Royal Rumble, failed to win the WWE title on multiple occasions, failed to win the World's Heavyweight Championship, and failed to win Money in the Bank. Those would have been more meaningful victories. In his match where something was on the line on Raw, he loses again. And he lost clean.
In two days, the WWE loses two top faces. Yes, Triple H was not a regular anymore and everyone knew Jericho was leaving, but it is still worth talking about it. First, going back to my point about some people complaining about Triple H having the spotlight after his match with Lesnar at Summerslam, would those same people complain about Jericho taking the spotlight after his loss to Ziggler. He even attacked Ziggler after the loss. And yet, I don't have too much of a problem with that. There is a small problem I do have, however. They wrote Triple H off with an injury and possibly retiring after that loss. He was mentally and physically broken. I don't think he needed all that. The injury would have been enough to send him away and let Lesnar look strong. I would have let Jericho be the one who leaves mentally broken. He loses another match where the stakes are high, and this one costs him his career. Instead of that, he takes a shot at Ziggler and leaves with his head high. Okay. I can understand not wanting to sell the same kind of story as Triple H just had. But I would have developed both differently. Lastly, is the WWE in a tough spot with these two out? No. Orton and Mysterio came back. Cena and Sheamus are around. As I type it, I realize the WWE really needs to do more to develop more faces. They are developing more new heels better than new faces, when it comes to main-eventers and upper-midcarders. Still, having Triple H and Jericho taking attention wouldn't solve that problem.
When Jericho does return again, what should happen? He can still come back refocused to win the title. And it would still be great if Ziggler is holding it when that happens. However, some of the kick may have been lost. Had he gone away a broken man, that return would have meant so much more. That kind of story is probably what they will sell with Triple H. As for Jericho, he definitely has not been buried with his recent run. They could have handled it better to draw in the fans. I still believe that. However, he can easily pick up with anything when he does return.
In two days, the WWE loses two top faces. Yes, Triple H was not a regular anymore and everyone knew Jericho was leaving, but it is still worth talking about it. First, going back to my point about some people complaining about Triple H having the spotlight after his match with Lesnar at Summerslam, would those same people complain about Jericho taking the spotlight after his loss to Ziggler. He even attacked Ziggler after the loss. And yet, I don't have too much of a problem with that. There is a small problem I do have, however. They wrote Triple H off with an injury and possibly retiring after that loss. He was mentally and physically broken. I don't think he needed all that. The injury would have been enough to send him away and let Lesnar look strong. I would have let Jericho be the one who leaves mentally broken. He loses another match where the stakes are high, and this one costs him his career. Instead of that, he takes a shot at Ziggler and leaves with his head high. Okay. I can understand not wanting to sell the same kind of story as Triple H just had. But I would have developed both differently. Lastly, is the WWE in a tough spot with these two out? No. Orton and Mysterio came back. Cena and Sheamus are around. As I type it, I realize the WWE really needs to do more to develop more faces. They are developing more new heels better than new faces, when it comes to main-eventers and upper-midcarders. Still, having Triple H and Jericho taking attention wouldn't solve that problem.
When Jericho does return again, what should happen? He can still come back refocused to win the title. And it would still be great if Ziggler is holding it when that happens. However, some of the kick may have been lost. Had he gone away a broken man, that return would have meant so much more. That kind of story is probably what they will sell with Triple H. As for Jericho, he definitely has not been buried with his recent run. They could have handled it better to draw in the fans. I still believe that. However, he can easily pick up with anything when he does return.
Monday, August 20, 2012
Brock Lesnar Defeats Triple H At Summerslam
Brock Lesnar vs. Triple H was indeed the main event of Summerslam. Even though the build could have been better, it looks like it ended up being the best choice. And Brock Lesnar finally won his first WWE match since his return. Moreover, he made Triple H tap. Triple H really put Lesnar over with that, giving him back a lot of credibility.
One thing I notice a lot of people complaining about is that Triple H took the attention after the match. I do not have a problem with that. Go back to when I talked about this match last week. Aside from trying to predict who might win, I also talked about how Triple H might still look strong, if he would lose. Considering that Triple H actually tapped out, which is one of the strongest ways to put someone over, I have no hate towards Triple H getting the attention after the match. If it was not for the fact that Lesnar really needed a win to give him some momentum for the rest of his run, this storyline should have had Triple H going over Lesnar. Triple H had reason for revenge. I don't see a reason to completely bury Triple H last night. Brock looked good, won the match in decisive fashion, and Triple H got a moment after the match. I'm okay with that.
One thing I notice a lot of people complaining about is that Triple H took the attention after the match. I do not have a problem with that. Go back to when I talked about this match last week. Aside from trying to predict who might win, I also talked about how Triple H might still look strong, if he would lose. Considering that Triple H actually tapped out, which is one of the strongest ways to put someone over, I have no hate towards Triple H getting the attention after the match. If it was not for the fact that Lesnar really needed a win to give him some momentum for the rest of his run, this storyline should have had Triple H going over Lesnar. Triple H had reason for revenge. I don't see a reason to completely bury Triple H last night. Brock looked good, won the match in decisive fashion, and Triple H got a moment after the match. I'm okay with that.
Friday, August 17, 2012
Random Thoughts For Smackdown 8/17/12
First, there was this match on Smackdown to determine who Booker T's new assistant would be between Kaitlyn and Eve. Did you need a more blatant example that the WWE is currently more concerned with the periphery of the diva division than the actual heart of the diva division itself? You would think things would revolve around the title. When was the last time there was a match on Raw or Smackdown to determine the #1 contender for the Diva's Championship? I don't even know. I'm not even going to cheat and look it up to seem like I know. Instead, two women fight for a position on the periphery. If you think about it, this current diva division really is the reverse of the division you had after Trish and Lita left. At that time, the WWE's chief concern was recreating the centerpiece. No divas were being properly developed in the periphery. After the WWE struck out multiple times, the agenda has changed to develop periphery divas, but you have no centerpiece. And you can see how that makes the division look. Anyway, Eve won the position. Because I have other things to talk about, I will not go into that too much now. I will get back to it one day.
Chris Jericho's final week before his next hiatus is winding down. On Smackdown, he was inserted into the matters involving Alberto Del Rio, Sheamus, and Booker T. He lost his match, which furthers the storyline he currently has, and still has Ziggler to look forward to at Summerslam. While on a message board recently, I saw someone come up with an interesting idea. Have Sheamus/Del Rio happen early on the card. No matter who wins, Ziggler can cash in and win. His match with Jericho would then turn into a title match later on in the night. Since Jericho is taking time off for his band, he obviously is not going to leave with the title. Although the idea is interesting, I wouldn't do it. Just have Ziggler beat Jericho and not cash in at all. In kayfabe, sell that loss as the reason Jericho finally breaks down and leaves. Ziggler can then get a ton of momentum from doing that. That will build him up for his eventual cashing in of the briefcase. Even if he does not win it through the briefcase, I think the WWE wants him to win back the title one day. And he will need the build for it. And it would be great if he is holding the title when Jericho is ready to come back. Perfect progression of this storyline. Jericho failed before, but he's re-motivated and back. Then, he wins the big one.
And what about Sheamus and Alberto Del Rio? Yes, it's back on. Sheamus wanted it, so Booker T eventually obliged. Weak. I was hoping for something good, but that was weak. It is not as bad as the hype for Jericho's return this year leading to no big actions, even though that seems to have been part of the storyline, but it is still a waste. The match is back on. I already spoke about why Ziggler does not need to cash in when talking about Jericho. There's another way to look at it. Why have Ziggler win the title and kill Del Rio's momentum? Del Rio has been going for the title for months now. To just write him off so easily to push Ziggler now would be a waste. The WWE should follow through with Del Rio now and continue to develop Ziggler for the moment.
Chris Jericho's final week before his next hiatus is winding down. On Smackdown, he was inserted into the matters involving Alberto Del Rio, Sheamus, and Booker T. He lost his match, which furthers the storyline he currently has, and still has Ziggler to look forward to at Summerslam. While on a message board recently, I saw someone come up with an interesting idea. Have Sheamus/Del Rio happen early on the card. No matter who wins, Ziggler can cash in and win. His match with Jericho would then turn into a title match later on in the night. Since Jericho is taking time off for his band, he obviously is not going to leave with the title. Although the idea is interesting, I wouldn't do it. Just have Ziggler beat Jericho and not cash in at all. In kayfabe, sell that loss as the reason Jericho finally breaks down and leaves. Ziggler can then get a ton of momentum from doing that. That will build him up for his eventual cashing in of the briefcase. Even if he does not win it through the briefcase, I think the WWE wants him to win back the title one day. And he will need the build for it. And it would be great if he is holding the title when Jericho is ready to come back. Perfect progression of this storyline. Jericho failed before, but he's re-motivated and back. Then, he wins the big one.
And what about Sheamus and Alberto Del Rio? Yes, it's back on. Sheamus wanted it, so Booker T eventually obliged. Weak. I was hoping for something good, but that was weak. It is not as bad as the hype for Jericho's return this year leading to no big actions, even though that seems to have been part of the storyline, but it is still a waste. The match is back on. I already spoke about why Ziggler does not need to cash in when talking about Jericho. There's another way to look at it. Why have Ziggler win the title and kill Del Rio's momentum? Del Rio has been going for the title for months now. To just write him off so easily to push Ziggler now would be a waste. The WWE should follow through with Del Rio now and continue to develop Ziggler for the moment.
Labels:
Alberto Del Rio,
Booker T,
Chris Jericho,
Dolph Ziggler,
Eve,
Kaitlyn,
Sheamus,
Smackdown,
Summerslam,
WWE
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Brock Vs. Triple H: True Summerslam Main Event?
It was obvious for a while that the match between Triple H and Brock Lesnar at Summerslam had the potential to be the true main event of the PPV. Both of these guys were top guys of their respective brands at one time. Brock then left the company. Triple H continued to be pushed as face of the company, until the rise of Cena. Brock went on to eventually find success in UFC. That has brought "legitimacy" to his return hype. He has hurt a lot of top guys in kayfabe since his return. Shawn Michaels was recently added to that list.
This was the first week where Raw really ended with the issues between Triple H and Brock Lesnar. And this is the week leading into Summerslam. Another clear sign that this may be the real main event? This will be the final match on the card? Does it deserve to be? What are the other options? Ignore Smackdown's World title match. A Smackdown World title match has not been the final match on a PPV card in a while. Instead, you have recently seen a string of Cena matches be the final match, even above WWE Championship matches. This time around, Cena happens to actually be in the WWE Championship match at Summerslam. Cena vs. CM Punk vs. Big Show. A while ago, Cena vs. Big Show was big enough to headline a PPV. Granted, John Laurinaitis had his job on the line there, making the match worth more. Toss in CM Punk and the WWE title into things. This is the feud that has been getting the major attention on Raw for weeks now, with the exception of this week. It should deserve to be the main event at Summerslam.
It comes down to hype. Looking around, I see no big summer angle. Was Triple H/Lesnar really supposed to be it? It is a big angle, but I don't feel they have done enough to develop it properly. They spent a long time teasing whether it would happen. They brought in Stephanie McMahon. Paul Heyman returned after years. Shawn Michaels was inserted into the story. If you think about it, that really was not necessary. It was an attempt to heighten the feud. It really wasn't too necessary for the actual storyline. Triple H would already want Lesnar for injuring him, throwing his weight around, and the lawsuits. And now, Triple H wants revenge for his best friend too? It may lead to an eventual storyline involving HBK down the road. If it does not, it would have been an attempt to hype this feud up further that didn't really work. The final 30 minutes or so of Raw seemed so awkward. Just analyzing things outside of kayfabe, the contract signing ended with still some time left to Raw. What would have happened if Lesnar did not attack Shawn Michaels? What else would they have done? And everyone expected the attack, anyway. It just didn't seem to be as fluid as it could have been planned to be. Too much wasted time and attempts to bring in more hype that were not really shocking or fresh. This feud has not been developed well.
Who wins? Can Lesnar finally win a match? Triple H does not need this win. Nothing is even really on the line in this match. Just let Lensar have it to keep some momentum going. This match can go down just like Triple H's loss to Sheamus a few weeks ago. Sheamus attacked Triple H early on before a match they had on PPV. When the match did occur, Triple H was not 100%, still tried to beat Sheamus, gave a great fight, and still lost in the end. Sheamus looked good for winning, but Triple H looked good for not going down easily. The story to this current feud was kind of going in that similar direction. A lot of people were saying Shawn Michaels would throw in the towel for Triple H at Summerslam, after seeing Triple H get destroyed and refuse to quit. Would have been good. Of course, Shawn's injured now, in kayfabe. What will they do now? I'm still thinking Lesnar will win somehow.
This was the first week where Raw really ended with the issues between Triple H and Brock Lesnar. And this is the week leading into Summerslam. Another clear sign that this may be the real main event? This will be the final match on the card? Does it deserve to be? What are the other options? Ignore Smackdown's World title match. A Smackdown World title match has not been the final match on a PPV card in a while. Instead, you have recently seen a string of Cena matches be the final match, even above WWE Championship matches. This time around, Cena happens to actually be in the WWE Championship match at Summerslam. Cena vs. CM Punk vs. Big Show. A while ago, Cena vs. Big Show was big enough to headline a PPV. Granted, John Laurinaitis had his job on the line there, making the match worth more. Toss in CM Punk and the WWE title into things. This is the feud that has been getting the major attention on Raw for weeks now, with the exception of this week. It should deserve to be the main event at Summerslam.
It comes down to hype. Looking around, I see no big summer angle. Was Triple H/Lesnar really supposed to be it? It is a big angle, but I don't feel they have done enough to develop it properly. They spent a long time teasing whether it would happen. They brought in Stephanie McMahon. Paul Heyman returned after years. Shawn Michaels was inserted into the story. If you think about it, that really was not necessary. It was an attempt to heighten the feud. It really wasn't too necessary for the actual storyline. Triple H would already want Lesnar for injuring him, throwing his weight around, and the lawsuits. And now, Triple H wants revenge for his best friend too? It may lead to an eventual storyline involving HBK down the road. If it does not, it would have been an attempt to hype this feud up further that didn't really work. The final 30 minutes or so of Raw seemed so awkward. Just analyzing things outside of kayfabe, the contract signing ended with still some time left to Raw. What would have happened if Lesnar did not attack Shawn Michaels? What else would they have done? And everyone expected the attack, anyway. It just didn't seem to be as fluid as it could have been planned to be. Too much wasted time and attempts to bring in more hype that were not really shocking or fresh. This feud has not been developed well.
Who wins? Can Lesnar finally win a match? Triple H does not need this win. Nothing is even really on the line in this match. Just let Lensar have it to keep some momentum going. This match can go down just like Triple H's loss to Sheamus a few weeks ago. Sheamus attacked Triple H early on before a match they had on PPV. When the match did occur, Triple H was not 100%, still tried to beat Sheamus, gave a great fight, and still lost in the end. Sheamus looked good for winning, but Triple H looked good for not going down easily. The story to this current feud was kind of going in that similar direction. A lot of people were saying Shawn Michaels would throw in the towel for Triple H at Summerslam, after seeing Triple H get destroyed and refuse to quit. Would have been good. Of course, Shawn's injured now, in kayfabe. What will they do now? I'm still thinking Lesnar will win somehow.
Labels:
Brock Lesnar,
Raw,
Shawn Michaels,
Summerslam,
Triple H,
WWE
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Summerslam's World Title Match Called Off?
It certainly is an interesting twist in this feud that has been going on for months between Sheamus and Alberto Del Rio for the World's Heavyweight Championship. Booker T, Smackdown's new GM, has called off the title match after Del Rio constructed this elaborate trap for Sheamus on Smackdown last week. Obviously, things have not ended just like that. This is just part of the storyline.
I think this is a great development. Not only does it get people wondering what will happen and tuning in to see what happens between Del Rio and Booker T, but this is great character development for Alberto Del Rio. A year ago, I referred to him as a "Master Heel". This was back when he was looking very good after winning his first WWE Championship. Shortly after saying that, as is often the case, the WWE made me eat my words. They made Del Rio's character look cowardly and pathetic. He was going against John Cena, after all. They screwed over Del Rio's potential to get very over more than they screwed up my expectations. Since then, ignoring the time he spent injured, the WWE would give him good moments here and there, but they never pushed hard and well for him to look good. Last week, he started to look like that "Master Heel" again. He had a bunch of thugs come out to help him get Sheamus. And now, he finds himself going against a face authority figure. That is good.
I think this guy has great potential to be a top heel. They just need to deliver with the storylines. I don't know how they will get this match between these two back on, but I still feel it is only a matter of time before Del Rio does win the title.
I think this is a great development. Not only does it get people wondering what will happen and tuning in to see what happens between Del Rio and Booker T, but this is great character development for Alberto Del Rio. A year ago, I referred to him as a "Master Heel". This was back when he was looking very good after winning his first WWE Championship. Shortly after saying that, as is often the case, the WWE made me eat my words. They made Del Rio's character look cowardly and pathetic. He was going against John Cena, after all. They screwed over Del Rio's potential to get very over more than they screwed up my expectations. Since then, ignoring the time he spent injured, the WWE would give him good moments here and there, but they never pushed hard and well for him to look good. Last week, he started to look like that "Master Heel" again. He had a bunch of thugs come out to help him get Sheamus. And now, he finds himself going against a face authority figure. That is good.
I think this guy has great potential to be a top heel. They just need to deliver with the storylines. I don't know how they will get this match between these two back on, but I still feel it is only a matter of time before Del Rio does win the title.
Labels:
Alberto Del Rio,
Booker T,
Sheamus,
Smackdown,
Summerslam,
WWE
Monday, August 13, 2012
AW Released
AW was released a few days ago. He was on thin ice after the controversial joke he made the week before. And the WWE decided to pull the trigger.
That isn't even the end of it. He has taken to Twitter and spoken out against what the WWE is doing. He is being punished for doing the job the WWE wanted him to do. He is a victim of the WWE's hypocrisy and double standards. Most of what I have read from him is true. I agree with it. I didn't blame him when this all started two weeks ago and I do not blame him now. The WWE was asking for all this to happen. Not only that, how can they think that Vince McMahon can get away with making fun of Jim Ross a few months ago. Isn't the boss supposed to set some kind of example of what he wants his workers to do? And I respect AW for not letting the WWE walk all over him. He might get buried down like Scott Steiner did when he spoke against TNA, but there is something to be said for speaking up for yourself. It's inspiring. It's not going to inspire this coward blogging right here to jump into action, yet, but AW has gained some respect from me.
What about the tag division? AW was the manager of the top heel team. The WWE was definitely legitimately rebuilding the tag division. As I have pointed out many times, it wasn't just hype this time. There was real investment in the tag division. AW may have been only a manager, but I have seen some fans say he was the most interesting thing in the tag division. The WWE could just bring in a new manager. In terms of position, anyone and everyone is replaceable. In terms of how well they can get the job done, however, some people are harder to replace than others, and in some rare situations, some people just really may be irreplaceable. If the WWE does replace AW, will the next guy be as entertaining or annoying to the fans as he was? Who replaces him? Tony Atlas? Teddy Long? Slick? There are options. In the end, I hope this does not lead to the WWE losing interest in the tag division too soon.
That isn't even the end of it. He has taken to Twitter and spoken out against what the WWE is doing. He is being punished for doing the job the WWE wanted him to do. He is a victim of the WWE's hypocrisy and double standards. Most of what I have read from him is true. I agree with it. I didn't blame him when this all started two weeks ago and I do not blame him now. The WWE was asking for all this to happen. Not only that, how can they think that Vince McMahon can get away with making fun of Jim Ross a few months ago. Isn't the boss supposed to set some kind of example of what he wants his workers to do? And I respect AW for not letting the WWE walk all over him. He might get buried down like Scott Steiner did when he spoke against TNA, but there is something to be said for speaking up for yourself. It's inspiring. It's not going to inspire this coward blogging right here to jump into action, yet, but AW has gained some respect from me.
What about the tag division? AW was the manager of the top heel team. The WWE was definitely legitimately rebuilding the tag division. As I have pointed out many times, it wasn't just hype this time. There was real investment in the tag division. AW may have been only a manager, but I have seen some fans say he was the most interesting thing in the tag division. The WWE could just bring in a new manager. In terms of position, anyone and everyone is replaceable. In terms of how well they can get the job done, however, some people are harder to replace than others, and in some rare situations, some people just really may be irreplaceable. If the WWE does replace AW, will the next guy be as entertaining or annoying to the fans as he was? Who replaces him? Tony Atlas? Teddy Long? Slick? There are options. In the end, I hope this does not lead to the WWE losing interest in the tag division too soon.
Friday, August 10, 2012
Bruisin' And Cruisin'
I actually like the story that is now developing between Sheamus and Alberto Del Rio. Last month, they had Del Rio attack Sheamus and brutalize him with his car. This week on Raw, they had Sheamus steal Del Rio's car and bring it back all messed up. It's a simple thing to do, but it makes this feud more than just a basic title feud. Just goes to show, when someone has a gimmick, that can make the storyline for a given feud more interesting. Of course, they can't spam doing this same thing for every feud Del Rio is in. But he has a character that has a lot of possibilities. That's probably one of the main reasons I like him. Things are finally starting to get a little more interesting.
There is a wildcard to this feud that I have not really mentioned. What will Dolph Ziggler be doing with that briefcase? Should he cash in at Summerslam? I don't think the WWE will do that. I don't think they should do that. Why rush it? John Cena just cashed in his briefcase a few weeks ago. In the past two years, the WWE would have one briefcase cashed in soon after the Money in the Bank PPV and the other one cashed in a few months later. That is the same thing I would expect now. No need to rush. Let it stay on the fans' minds for a while. When will Ziggler do it? When will he try to cash in? Will he succeed? They can definitely tease him doing it at Summerslam, but don't have him actually follow through, yet. Just keep Summerslam really just between Sheamus and Del Rio.
There is a wildcard to this feud that I have not really mentioned. What will Dolph Ziggler be doing with that briefcase? Should he cash in at Summerslam? I don't think the WWE will do that. I don't think they should do that. Why rush it? John Cena just cashed in his briefcase a few weeks ago. In the past two years, the WWE would have one briefcase cashed in soon after the Money in the Bank PPV and the other one cashed in a few months later. That is the same thing I would expect now. No need to rush. Let it stay on the fans' minds for a while. When will Ziggler do it? When will he try to cash in? Will he succeed? They can definitely tease him doing it at Summerslam, but don't have him actually follow through, yet. Just keep Summerslam really just between Sheamus and Del Rio.
Labels:
Alberto Del Rio,
Dolph Ziggler,
Raw,
Sheamus,
Summerslam,
WWE
Wednesday, August 8, 2012
And Kelly Kelly Returns
The return of the centerpiece? Kelly Kelly returned to Raw this week. She won her match. That was actually the first diva match on Raw in quite some time. In all that time, the Diva's Champion has not been featured well. AJ Lee has been developed as a periphery diva. That is to say, she has been developed by the WWE to be a success on the sidelines of the major diva division matters. But who is that woman meant to be the star of the actual division? That woman meant to be sold as the best female wrestler of the division, frequently getting the title and elaborate diva storylines to put her over? No one is being pushed like that.
You go back one year. They were definitely pushing Kelly Kelly to be the centerpiece. Right after Michelle McCool left, the transition to putting focus on Kelly Kelly was almost perfectly smooth. She fits the profile of the kind of woman they like to push as the centerpiece and was getting the kind of push, including a push against a credible jobber, Beth Phoenix, to sell her ability to go at it with credible threats and overcome them. They then tried to do this angle where losing the title drove Kelly Kelly into this new zone. She went crazy on Beth Phoenix. And shortly after that, she lost to Beth, the WWE fizzled out on pushing her, and the dark age the division is currently in became very visible. Although Beth's title reign was long, they did not develop feuds for her as best as they could have and showed inconsistency. Back to Kelly Kelly. They did give up on her as the centerpiece. Whether it was because she was not as solid in the ring as they would have liked, they thought they would not be able to develop her character as they would have liked, or she was expressing interest in taking time off, they gave up. She definitely was not as solid in the ring as Michelle McCool and was not connecting well with all types of fans. But I still wonder why they gave up. However, she still went on to win a Slammy and have her moment at Wrestlemania. Gave up on her as centerpiece, but still treated her better than some.
Now that she has returned, will they try to make her the centerpiece again? Were all those months of not pushing her since last year just a rest period? Centerpieces get rests all the time, including Cena. But you can see how much a rest period can hurt, particularly when you are not getting any storylines at all. In the case of Kelly Kelly, she had not even solidified her overness and position yet, which would make wanting to give her a rest so soon very foolish. Do you know why you can afford to bring back a guy like The Undertaker just once a year? This guy has already built a legacy off over a decade of regularly being featured with great storylines, feuds, and moments. He is a legend. Giving a diva you are developing as the centerpiece of your division similar treatment before she even has a solid hold on the overness you want her to have is questionable. And yet, Kelly Kelly seems like the only diva they are interested in having that position on the current roster. If they wanted another woman to have it, they would have already have developed her. If Kelly Kelly is the one, they need to come up with fresh workers to put her over and storylines to really get the fans to buy into her. The latter is where they have been really incapable of getting the job done since they started pushing her last year.
You go back one year. They were definitely pushing Kelly Kelly to be the centerpiece. Right after Michelle McCool left, the transition to putting focus on Kelly Kelly was almost perfectly smooth. She fits the profile of the kind of woman they like to push as the centerpiece and was getting the kind of push, including a push against a credible jobber, Beth Phoenix, to sell her ability to go at it with credible threats and overcome them. They then tried to do this angle where losing the title drove Kelly Kelly into this new zone. She went crazy on Beth Phoenix. And shortly after that, she lost to Beth, the WWE fizzled out on pushing her, and the dark age the division is currently in became very visible. Although Beth's title reign was long, they did not develop feuds for her as best as they could have and showed inconsistency. Back to Kelly Kelly. They did give up on her as the centerpiece. Whether it was because she was not as solid in the ring as they would have liked, they thought they would not be able to develop her character as they would have liked, or she was expressing interest in taking time off, they gave up. She definitely was not as solid in the ring as Michelle McCool and was not connecting well with all types of fans. But I still wonder why they gave up. However, she still went on to win a Slammy and have her moment at Wrestlemania. Gave up on her as centerpiece, but still treated her better than some.
Now that she has returned, will they try to make her the centerpiece again? Were all those months of not pushing her since last year just a rest period? Centerpieces get rests all the time, including Cena. But you can see how much a rest period can hurt, particularly when you are not getting any storylines at all. In the case of Kelly Kelly, she had not even solidified her overness and position yet, which would make wanting to give her a rest so soon very foolish. Do you know why you can afford to bring back a guy like The Undertaker just once a year? This guy has already built a legacy off over a decade of regularly being featured with great storylines, feuds, and moments. He is a legend. Giving a diva you are developing as the centerpiece of your division similar treatment before she even has a solid hold on the overness you want her to have is questionable. And yet, Kelly Kelly seems like the only diva they are interested in having that position on the current roster. If they wanted another woman to have it, they would have already have developed her. If Kelly Kelly is the one, they need to come up with fresh workers to put her over and storylines to really get the fans to buy into her. The latter is where they have been really incapable of getting the job done since they started pushing her last year.
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Orton Still A Top Player
Before Randy Orton returned from his suspension, there was some speculation that he may suffer a demotion. Ignoring what dirtsheets were saying, even common sense may have told you that this was a possibility. One of the WWE's top stars is getting busted for doing drugs, and at a time when the WWE is trying to be PG and not draw negative attention to itself. With one more strike needed to release him, that might make some people say that the WWE should not even bother trying with him anymore.
Randy Orton is still a top star. Without even going into making a movie, just look at how they are pushing him on Raw and Smackdown. He has been looking good. Last night on Raw, Randy Orton took on Big Show, one of the men competing for the WWE Championship at Summerslam. CM Punk and John Cena won their matches on Raw. Big Show did not win against Orton. Neither man actually won the match, but Randy Orton laid out Big Show with an RKO. Orton isn't even involved in this feud. Big Show still came back later in the night to sell the idea that he has a chance to win the title at Summerslam, but Orton is not being buried.
Problem is, Orton doesn't really have a feud or storyline going. I would not say that is a punishment. It's hard to keep the ball rolling for everyone. Christian does not really have anything going for him. Jack Swagger is lost, but that is nothing new. I don't even need to mention some of the divas who are getting nothing. Rey Mysterio looked like he may get a feud with Alberto Del Rio, but pushing Del Rio again against Sheamus has left Rey out. What should Orton get? Wade Barrett is returning. They hyped it. Technically, it looked like the WWE was already moving away from the feud between these two prior to Wade's injury, but it can be a big way to bring Wade back in. And this would not be a huge demotion for Orton. I doubt the WWE would waste Orton on Miz. They could also try putting Orton against Ziggler to further develop Ziggler's credibility, after Jericho leaves. Still, I think the feud with Barrett could be best. It would be better than bringing Wade back to squash jobbers for weeks and weeks.
Randy Orton is still a top star. Without even going into making a movie, just look at how they are pushing him on Raw and Smackdown. He has been looking good. Last night on Raw, Randy Orton took on Big Show, one of the men competing for the WWE Championship at Summerslam. CM Punk and John Cena won their matches on Raw. Big Show did not win against Orton. Neither man actually won the match, but Randy Orton laid out Big Show with an RKO. Orton isn't even involved in this feud. Big Show still came back later in the night to sell the idea that he has a chance to win the title at Summerslam, but Orton is not being buried.
Problem is, Orton doesn't really have a feud or storyline going. I would not say that is a punishment. It's hard to keep the ball rolling for everyone. Christian does not really have anything going for him. Jack Swagger is lost, but that is nothing new. I don't even need to mention some of the divas who are getting nothing. Rey Mysterio looked like he may get a feud with Alberto Del Rio, but pushing Del Rio again against Sheamus has left Rey out. What should Orton get? Wade Barrett is returning. They hyped it. Technically, it looked like the WWE was already moving away from the feud between these two prior to Wade's injury, but it can be a big way to bring Wade back in. And this would not be a huge demotion for Orton. I doubt the WWE would waste Orton on Miz. They could also try putting Orton against Ziggler to further develop Ziggler's credibility, after Jericho leaves. Still, I think the feud with Barrett could be best. It would be better than bringing Wade back to squash jobbers for weeks and weeks.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Jericho To Leave Again
Jericho will be taking another hiatus after a few more appearances in the WWE. He hasn't even been back a year, but he's already leaving? And after a mediocre run? Maybe that was the whole point? That is to say, that was the story that they wanted to push with this stint.
On the one hand, it is somewhat clever. I can't think of a situation where a top guy came back with a ton of hype, had multiple opportunities to accomplish something big, failed every time, and then left again. It is an interesting story. And Jericho has said before that he likes to try different things. And losing a lot will obviously not hurt his credibility, as long as they can easily still push him in big feuds whenever he does come back. It's just like how Cena failing to win the title from CM Punk with the briefcase does not stop him from being centerpiece. It doesn't hurt Jericho and is something different.
On the other hand, repeating my main complaint about this for months now, you hype something big and don't deliver. Is that good business? Go back to the recent wedding between AJ and Daniel Bryan. They announced it on Raw, promoted it, and then had the wedding segment on the 1000th episode. During that segment, Vince McMahon announced that AJ was the new GM. Something big happened. Imagine if it went a little differently. Daniel Bryan proposes to AJ, she accepts, the WWE promotes the wedding, and then on the day of the wedding, they have a brief backstage segment where the two mutually agree not to have the wedding. That's all. That would be a letdown. If the WWE wanted to promote this story of Jericho possibly losing his touch, that's one thing, but I still believe they could have delivered more in how he went about trying to accomplish his goals, even if they all did fail. That might have helped draw the interest of the fans.
It won't be a huge loss with Jericho once again leaving. They are building up Dolph Ziggler. Randy Orton just returned. Wade Barrett is coming back soon. If it really needs to happen, even Triple H can come back for a few more matches. The WWE shouldn't be in any trouble.
On the one hand, it is somewhat clever. I can't think of a situation where a top guy came back with a ton of hype, had multiple opportunities to accomplish something big, failed every time, and then left again. It is an interesting story. And Jericho has said before that he likes to try different things. And losing a lot will obviously not hurt his credibility, as long as they can easily still push him in big feuds whenever he does come back. It's just like how Cena failing to win the title from CM Punk with the briefcase does not stop him from being centerpiece. It doesn't hurt Jericho and is something different.
On the other hand, repeating my main complaint about this for months now, you hype something big and don't deliver. Is that good business? Go back to the recent wedding between AJ and Daniel Bryan. They announced it on Raw, promoted it, and then had the wedding segment on the 1000th episode. During that segment, Vince McMahon announced that AJ was the new GM. Something big happened. Imagine if it went a little differently. Daniel Bryan proposes to AJ, she accepts, the WWE promotes the wedding, and then on the day of the wedding, they have a brief backstage segment where the two mutually agree not to have the wedding. That's all. That would be a letdown. If the WWE wanted to promote this story of Jericho possibly losing his touch, that's one thing, but I still believe they could have delivered more in how he went about trying to accomplish his goals, even if they all did fail. That might have helped draw the interest of the fans.
It won't be a huge loss with Jericho once again leaving. They are building up Dolph Ziggler. Randy Orton just returned. Wade Barrett is coming back soon. If it really needs to happen, even Triple H can come back for a few more matches. The WWE shouldn't be in any trouble.
Friday, August 3, 2012
Tag Division Continues, Despite AW Drama
Even though Kofi Kingston and R-Truth retained the tag titles against Darren Young and Titus O'Neil a few weeks ago, the feud is not over. That is good. Abraham Washington (AW) has also been very vocal to help keep this feud interesting, but I will get to him in another respect in a second. They are also having the heels still interact with Rosa and her two guys. None of these three teams are really being buried. They are still getting attention. What about The Usos? Once the titles get on a heel team, I am sure they will be getting a little more attention in time. The fact is, it seems like there are too many face teams and not enough major heel teams. I am aware of Reks & Hawkins and Hunico & Camacho, but these are jobber teams. They need more development. That might not be happening anytime soon. If the titles are going on Young and O'Neil, it may not be very likely that the WWE would develop more heel teams at the same time. Focus would already be on a heel team that is still in the process of being developed.
And what about that AW? There was some controversy this week about the comments he made on Raw. I don't blame him. I can understand where some people may be offended, but I don't blame him. The WWE has been pushing the boundaries of what they can get away with within the PG realm for a while. I mentioned that idea back a few months ago when talking about Eve. The WWE wants to have the best of both worlds. When you try to do that, it seems you sometimes might do something in one world that causes trouble in the other world. And I have no reason to doubt the WWE will continue to push the envelope. How much trouble will they get in next time?
And what about that AW? There was some controversy this week about the comments he made on Raw. I don't blame him. I can understand where some people may be offended, but I don't blame him. The WWE has been pushing the boundaries of what they can get away with within the PG realm for a while. I mentioned that idea back a few months ago when talking about Eve. The WWE wants to have the best of both worlds. When you try to do that, it seems you sometimes might do something in one world that causes trouble in the other world. And I have no reason to doubt the WWE will continue to push the envelope. How much trouble will they get in next time?
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Alberto Del Rio Vs. Sheamus: Take 4
I didn't think they would keep this feud running for so long, and without even having Del Rio win the title yet. If he should win the title at Summerslam, that means there will be a rematch. Will it ever end?
Sheamus vs. Alberto Del Rio. If you think about it, this is this year's version of Orton vs. Christian. I'm not talking about the storyline. Orton vs. Christian was Smackdown's big World title feud during the summer of last year. It lasted months and months. Christian eventually won the title back, but then lost it back to Orton. After Summerslam 2011, the feud was really over. Orton moved on to feud with Mark Henry. Switching back to 2012, Alberto Del Rio pretty much has to do it this time. If not, it would just be a total waste. They could have moved on to putting Sheamus against some guys in the midcard who had momentum for a World title feud. Cody Rhodes would have been a good choice. If they weren't going to do that before, there is no point in hoping they would keep the title on Sheamus to do it after Summerslam.
What happens if Del Rio wins it? No need to hand it back to Sheamus. Randy Orton is back. Besides that, there is that feud between Del Rio and Rey Mysterio that never got a proper finish. Rey came back and went after Del Rio a few weeks ago. They have moved that to the back and put Sheamus vs. Del Rio back in front. That sounds familiar to me. When Del Rio returned from his injury a few months ago, it looked like he would be in the title picture, but then they moved him to the side to finish Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus. Randy Orton and Rey Mysterio would be the top choices for a title feud against a heel Alberto Del Rio. And those are two great options. No need for Sheamus to hold it much longer.
How has the feud between Del Rio and Sheamus been developing? Aside from taking so long, it has gone back to being repetitive. Basic title feud. One guy has the title and the other wants it. When Del Rio said on Raw that he refuses to wrestle until Summerslam, that actually sounded like an interesting detail to add to the storyline, to me anyway. But it doesn't look like they will actually be doing that. No matter what, it has to be almost over.
Sheamus vs. Alberto Del Rio. If you think about it, this is this year's version of Orton vs. Christian. I'm not talking about the storyline. Orton vs. Christian was Smackdown's big World title feud during the summer of last year. It lasted months and months. Christian eventually won the title back, but then lost it back to Orton. After Summerslam 2011, the feud was really over. Orton moved on to feud with Mark Henry. Switching back to 2012, Alberto Del Rio pretty much has to do it this time. If not, it would just be a total waste. They could have moved on to putting Sheamus against some guys in the midcard who had momentum for a World title feud. Cody Rhodes would have been a good choice. If they weren't going to do that before, there is no point in hoping they would keep the title on Sheamus to do it after Summerslam.
What happens if Del Rio wins it? No need to hand it back to Sheamus. Randy Orton is back. Besides that, there is that feud between Del Rio and Rey Mysterio that never got a proper finish. Rey came back and went after Del Rio a few weeks ago. They have moved that to the back and put Sheamus vs. Del Rio back in front. That sounds familiar to me. When Del Rio returned from his injury a few months ago, it looked like he would be in the title picture, but then they moved him to the side to finish Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus. Randy Orton and Rey Mysterio would be the top choices for a title feud against a heel Alberto Del Rio. And those are two great options. No need for Sheamus to hold it much longer.
How has the feud between Del Rio and Sheamus been developing? Aside from taking so long, it has gone back to being repetitive. Basic title feud. One guy has the title and the other wants it. When Del Rio said on Raw that he refuses to wrestle until Summerslam, that actually sounded like an interesting detail to add to the storyline, to me anyway. But it doesn't look like they will actually be doing that. No matter what, it has to be almost over.
Labels:
Alberto Del Rio,
Raw,
Sheamus,
Smackdown,
Summerslam,
WWE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)